What are three classic Western arguments for the existence of God?

What are three classic Western arguments for the existence of God?

While the three argument types above, ontological, cosmological, and teleological, are regarded as the main classical types of arguments for the existence of God, some philosophers have used moral grounds to argue that God must exist.

What is the meaning of existence of God?

existence of God, in religion, the proposition that there is a supreme supernatural or preternatural being that is the creator or sustainer or ruler of the universe and all things in it, including human beings.

How did St Anselm prove the existence of God?

Anselm claims to derive the existence of God from the concept of a being than which no greater can be conceived. Anselm reasoned that, if such a being fails to exist, then a greater being—namely, a being than which no greater can be conceived, and which exists—can be conceived.

Who is God according to Anselm?

(iv) But then we can conceive something greater than God. (v) This is a contradiction, so if God exists in our understanding, God must exist. According to Anselm, not only is God that which nothing greater can be conceived, God is also… a. Omniscient, Omnipotent, and All good.

Which is the best definition of the existence of God?

Existence of God, in religion, the proposition that there is a supreme being that is the creator or sustainer or ruler of the universe and all things in it, including human beings. In many religions God is also conceived as perfect, all-powerful and all-knowing, and the source and ultimate ground of morality.

Is the Bible evidence for the existence of God?

Whether critics like it or not, the Bible is a valid form of evidence for the existence of God. Not merely “because the Bible says so,” but because the Bible has proved to be so reliable. Dismissing it as biased, simply because it says things skeptics do not accept, is not a rational response.

Is the question of the existence of God worth discussing?

The ignostic (or igtheist) usually concludes that the question of God’s existence or nonexistence is usually not worth discussing because concepts like “God” are usually not sufficiently or clearly defined.

What does Aquinas say about the existence of God?

Something must be the first or prime mover, the first efficient cause, the necessary ground of contingent beings, the supreme perfection that imperfect beings approach, and the intelligent guide of natural things toward their ends. This, Aquinas said, is God.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top