Is Langmuir a good journal?
Langmuir ranks #2 in citations out of 136 journals in the category of Physical Chemistry with 113,157 total citations. The journal received an Impact Factor of 4.384*. This journal is also indexed in the categories of Materials Science (ranked #1) and Multidisciplinary Chemistry (ranked #5).
Is Frontiers in psychology a good journal?
According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2020 impact factor of 2.990. Scopus classifies it as a general psychology journal and gives it a 2019 CiteScore rank of 73% (above average) compared to all other indexed general psychology journals.
What is Systematic Reviews journal?
The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision …
Is the psychological review a journal?
Rev. OCLC no. Psychological Review is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal that covers psychological theory. Psychological Review soon became the most prominent and influential psychology journal in North America, publishing important articles by William James, John Dewey, James Rowland Angell, and many others.
Is ACS Omega a good journal?
ACS Omega is a fully open access journal with a broad, multidisciplinary scope. ACS Omega publishes high-quality new findings, studies that demonstrate the reproducibility of existing research, large datasets, and noteworthy negative results.
Is Frontiers a predatory journal?
Frontiers Media SA is a publisher of peer-reviewed open access scientific journals currently active in science, technology, and medicine. In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. COPE and OASPA have retained Frontiers as a member after concerns were raised.
Is it bad to publish in Frontiers?
According to critics of this move, the Frontiers publisher is “legitimate and reputable and does offer proper peer-review” (Bloudoff-Indelicato 2015). Frontiers journals appear to be quite different from typical predatory outlets on the face value of their citation rates.
What are the limitations of the systematic review?
Many reviews did not provide adequate summaries of the included studies. Settings of test use, the expected role of the test, study design characteristics, and demographics of participants, were often not reported. The counts needed to reconstruct the 2×2 tables of results used in each study were often not provided.
Why are systematic reviews good?
Systematic reviews systematically evaluate and summarize current knowledge and have many advantages over narrative reviews. Meta-analyses provide a more reliable and enhanced precision of effect estimate than do individual studies.
How do I cite a psychological review?
Psychological Review
- Citation Style: Author-Year-Cited Pages.
- Date: Wednesday, January 09, 2013.
- Discipline: Psychology.
- File Name: Psychological Review.ens.
- Publisher: APA.
- URL: http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/rev/index.aspx.
- Based On: APA 6th.
- Bibliography Sort Order: Author-Year-Title.