What is a 55-250mm lens good for?
The 55-250 is a telephoto, usually used for subjects at a distance (the soccer players, for example, or wildlife you can’t get close to).
What is 70-300mm lens used for?
A 70-300 mm lens is a medium telephoto lens often employed for taking photos of wildlife, sporting events, and astronomical subjects such as the moon, planets, and stars. It is also recommended for travel photography, street photography, and other candid occasions.
How far can a 55-250mm lens zoom?
At 250mm, the maximum magnification is 0.31x, which does not come into the true 1:1 macro range. The closest focusing distance is 1.1 metres. Neither a distance scale nor indicators for depth of field or infrared adjustment are provided. The lens is supplied with end caps but no lens hood.
Which lens is better 55-250mm or 70 300mm?
Re: EF-S 55-250mm or EF 70-300mm? No there isn’t a big difference between 250 and 300, you can move closer or crop. The 55-250 is almost 40% lighter much shorter and sellls for 1/2 the price. the 70-300 has USM, better glass, better built and 50 more mm.
How far can 250mm lens shoot?
At 250mm, the maximum magnification is 0.31x, which does not come into the true 1:1 macro range. The closest focusing distance is 1.1 metres.
Which is better 55-250mm or 70-300mm?
In the case of these two lenses, the 55-250 can use smaller amounts of higher quality materials and still be manufactured for a very reasonable cost. The 55-250, while not outstanding, performs comparably to the more expensive EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM in terms of optics.
Which is better Canon 50mm or 70mm?
Again it depends on your style of shooting, but the 50mm f1.8 is a low light lens which you could use in case of bad light. The IS in the 55-250mm is nothing great and since you have the ISO advantage its worth taking the risk of the 70-300mm and you would have more range too.
How much does a canon 55-250mm lens cost?
This is important because you’re very likely to want to resell that lens — maybe not long after you acquire it. The 55-250 is a solid beginner telephoto lens (I owned this lens for a while), but $250 is too much to pay for it. I bought mine refurbished from Adorama for $200, and it’s still available there at that price.
What’s the difference between a 75-300 and a 70-300?
This is an important clarification, because the 75-300 lens is very inexpensive (matching the price you indicated in your question) and not very well-regarded in terms of image quality, whereas the 70-300 is newer, pricier ($500 new, and easily $350-400 used), and has IS and USM. If you can really get the 70-300 for $150, I’d buy it in a heartbeat.