What are the differences between glaucon and Socrates arguments?
Socrates said that he believed justice falls into the second category; according to him justice is good intrinsically and instrumentally. Glaucon argued that, by nature, doing injustice is good but the law can force you to act against that. According to Glaucon, justice is naturally bad and injustice is naturally good.
What is the relationship between Socrates and glaucon?
Biography. Glaucon was the older brother of Plato and, like his brother, was in the inner circle of the young affluent students of Socrates. Although little is known about his life, some information can be extrapolated from Plato’s writings and from later Platonic biographers.
What is the main idea that Socrates is talking about to glaucon?
Glaucon asks Socrates to describe what justice and injustice each do in themselves, how justice benefits those who have justice and how injustice harms them. Glaucon and Adeimantus want Socrates to describe the pure qualities of justice and injustice.
What is the ultimate question that glaucon challenges Socrates with and how do they propose to answer the question?
Glaucon proposes a test to Socrates: compare the life of a completely just person with the life of a completely unjust person. Justice is vindicated only if Socrates can show that the just person’s life is better.
Does Socrates answer Glaucon?
Socrates’ full response to the challenges presented by Glaucon and Adeimantus are found in Book IX. Socrates explains that justice is a good within itself and within the soul because a just soul is a free soul. If not for the just, properly organized soul, the individual’s soul would not be in its most free state.
Why does Glaucon not like the initial city described by Socrates?
Socrates calls this city the “healthy city” because it is governed only by necessary desires. Glaucon looks less kindly on this city, calling it a “city of pigs.” He points out that such a city is impossible: people have unnecessary desires as well as these necessary ones.
Does Glaucon agree with Socrates?
With Glaucon and Adeimantus is agreement with Socrates in how they will begin their search for justice, Socrates introduces the origin of the city. Each man, he says, is unable to provide for all of his needs and therefore requires the assistance that can only be provided by the city.
Who is Glaucon and Socrates in allegory of the cave?
It is written as a dialogue between Plato’s brother Glaucon and his mentor Socrates, narrated by the latter. The allegory is presented after the analogy of the sun (508b–509c) and the analogy of the divided line (509d–511e).
What is Glaucon’s challenge to Socrates in other words what is Glaucon attempting to persuade Socrates of?
In Book II, Glaucon challenges Socrates to show him that justice is a good in itself, that it allows one to be happy in private, and is more beneficial than doing injustice whether one has the reputation for justice or not, even among the gods.
How does Socrates answer Glaucon’s challenge?
Initially, Socrates attempts to respond to Glaucon’s challenge by providing his account of Platonic justice—that there are three parts of the soul, each with one function, and that justice occurs when each part does it particular function without interfering with the other parts.
What is glaucon’s objection to the city as outlined by Socrates?
Glaucon’s objection is that there is no luxury in the city that Socrates is describing, he said that Socrates is creating a city where the people feast with no luxuries.
How does Socrates respond to glaucon’s challenge?
How did Glaucon test Socrates view of Justice?
In Book Two of The Republic, Glaucon tests Socrates view of justice. Socrates believes that “injustice is never more profitable than justice” (31). With this, he describes how the good life is determined by whether you are just or unjust.
What was the challenge that Glaucon set out for Plato?
The problem that Plato will try to resolve is set out by Glaucon and Adeimantus: showing that justice is worth valuing “for its own sake” rather than only being valued “for what comes from it.” Adeimantus puts the challenge in a way that tells us a lot about how Plato will try to meet it:
How does Socrates explain how the Good Life is determined?
With this, he describes how the good life is determined by whether you are just or unjust. Socrates explains how justice is observed through the genuine acts of human character; justice is evaluated by how morally right one is. Glaucon however challenges this idea, as he wishes to be shown why being just is desirable.
Why did Glaucon want to be shown why he was just?
Glaucon however challenges this idea, as he wishes to be shown why being just is desirable. He trusts that we as humans naturally act just because the scare of punishment.