Why was nuking Japan good?

Why was nuking Japan good?

Many historians have argued that the atomic bombing of Japan at the end of World War II was necessary and justified. It led to a quick end to World War II. It saved the lives of American soldiers. It potentially saved the lives of Japanese soldiers and civilians.

Did Japan Forgive us for bombing?

‘Hey, Let’s Forget That’: No US Apology for the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 75 years later, the U.S. remains committed to its narrative that the bombings were necessary and justified — and that no apology is necessary to the victims. Atomic cloud rises over Nagasaki, Japan.

Did Hiroshima actually save lives?

Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people.

What was the impact of using the atomic bomb?

The uranium bomb detonated over Hiroshima on 6 August 1945 had an explosive yield equal to 15,000 tonnes of TNT. It razed and burnt around 70 per cent of all buildings and caused an estimated 140,000 deaths by the end of 1945, along with increased rates of cancer and chronic disease among the survivors.

Who told Truman about the a bomb?

On August 9, the day the Nagasaki bomb was dropped, Truman received a telegram from Samuel McCrea Cavert, a Protestant clergyman, who pleaded with the president to stop the bombing “before any further devastation by atomic bomb is visited upon her [Japan’s] people.” Two days later, Truman replied, “The only language …

Did Japan ever apologize for Pearl Harbor?

Emperor Hirohito let it be known to General MacArthur that he was prepared to apologize formally to General MacArthur for Japan’s actions during World War II—including an apology for the December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor.

Does US regret bombing Japan?

So: Yes, there is little evidence that Truman ever truly regretted his order to utilize the bomb.

Why was this soldier in support of the use of the atomic bomb?

Why was this soldier in support of the use of the atomic bomb? 1. The soldier was happy about the fact that the war was over. If the war was still on, he would had to put into battles in Japan until Japanese government surrendered.

What were the main arguments for and against dropping the atomic bomb on Japan?

Those who oppose the bombings argue it was militarily unnecessary, inherently immoral, a war crime, or a form of state terrorism. Critics believe a naval blockade and conventional bombings would have forced Japan to surrender unconditionally.

Which bomb was worse Hiroshima or Nagasaki?

The plutonium-type bomb detonated over Nagasaki actually had a greater explosive power than that used on Hiroshima. The reason for the greater number of casualties in the latter city is to be sought in large part in differences in the physical features of the two cities.