What did the Supreme Court case McCleskey v Kemp reveal?
In a writ of habeas corpus, McCleskey argued that a statistical study proved that the imposition of the death penalty in Georgia depended to some extent on the race of the victim and the accused. The study found that black defendants who kill white victims are the most likely to receive death sentences in the state.
Did McCleskey receive the death penalty?
The jury recommended that he be sentenced to death on the murder charge and to consecutive life sentences on the armed robbery charges. The court followed the jury’s recommendation and sentenced McCleskey to death.
What did McCleskey do?
* McCleskey, a black man, was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and one count of murder in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, on October 12, 1978. McCleskey’s convictions arose out of the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer during the course of the robbery.
Did the statistical study prove that McCleskey’s sentence violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Did the statistical study prove that McCleskey’s sentence violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments? The Court held that since McCleskey could not prove that purposeful discrimination which had a discriminatory effect on him existed in this particular trial, there was no constitutional violation.
What was the significance of the decision in McCleskey v Kemp 1987 quizlet?
(1987) The Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty against charges that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment because minority defendants were more likely to receive the death penalty than were white defendants.
What was the significance of the decision in McCleskey v Kemp 1987?
Kemp. The Supreme Court’s decision in McCleskey protected criminal justice laws and policies from being challenged on the basis of racially disparate impact. Ultimately, the McCleskey decision set the stage for more than 20 years of dramatically increasing racial disparities within the criminal justice system.
What did the Supreme Court determine in Adarand Constructors v Peña quizlet?
In Adarand Constructors v. Pena, the Supreme Court determined the standard by which affirmative action policies should be evaluated. What standard did they use? Affirmative action policies must be scrutinized using the same suspect standard that is used for other policies classifying people by race.
What is the significance of the Supreme Court case Ford v Wainwright 1986 quizlet?
What is the significance of the Supreme Court case, Ford v. Wainwright (1986)? Citing the Eighth Amendment, it prohibited the execution of mentally incompetent defendants.
What did Ford v Wainwright establish?
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the common law rule that the insane cannot be executed; therefore the petitioner is entitled to a competency evaluation and to an evidentiary hearing in court on the question of their competency to be executed.
What was the case of McCleskey v Kemp?
McCLESKEY v. KEMP (1987) In 1978, petitioner, a black man, was convicted in a Georgia trial court of armed robbery and murder, arising from the killing of a white police officer during the robbery of a store.
Why was the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey so important?
The Supreme Court’s decision in McCleskey protected criminal justice laws and policies from being challenged on the basis of racially disparate impact. Ultimately, the McCleskey decision set the stage for more than 20 years of dramatically increasing racial disparities within the criminal justice system.
Why was McCleskey sentenced to death for armed robbery?
Brief Fact Summary. McCleskey (Defendant) was sentenced to death for his role in an armed robbery, which resulted in the murder of a police officer. He challenged his sentence on the ground that it was imposed because he was black.