How do you use Christology in a sentence?
In his Christology he departed from the Lutheran and Zwinglian doctrine of the two natures by insisting on what he called the Vergotterung des Fleisches Christi, the deification or the glorification of the flesh of Christ.
What is Christology below and Christology above?
In this sense the ‘ above ‘ in ‘ Christology from above ‘ refers to God’s actions in the Incarnation, and the ontological result of that action (the hypostatic union), whereas the ‘ below ‘ in ‘ Christology from below ‘ refers to the gradual process by which the ·apostolic understanding of that action developed.
What is orthodox Christology?
Christology. Eastern Orthodox Christians believe the incarnate Word of God is one person in two natures, both fully divine and fully human, perfectly God (τέλειος Θεός) and perfectly man (τέλειος άνθρωπος). Christ had a divine will, or set of desires and spiritual incentives, and a human will with fleshly drives.
What is the doctrine of Christology?
Christology, Christian reflection, teaching, and doctrine concerning Jesus of Nazareth. Christology is the part of theology that is concerned with the nature and work of Jesus, including such matters as the Incarnation, the Resurrection, and his human and divine natures and their relationship.
What Christology means?
What is the difference between Christology from below and from above?
What is the meaning of Christology from above?
In essence, “Christology from above” begins, as John’s Gospel begins, with Jesus as the Logos, the Word of God, and then seeks to illuminate how the Divine Logos took on humanity.
Can a Christology from below be a normative Christology?
A Christology from below undercuts the epistemological grounds for a normative Christology. Only a Christology from above provides the warrant for the Bible’s and the Church’s theological confession of Christ.
Is the functionality of Christ based on ontology?
Functionality is based on ontology. To restate this: “Ontology and soteriology mutually condition one another.” [4] Or to put this in our terms, what Christ did was based on who He was. The modern theologian considers his philosophical views as more substantive than God’s revelation.