What was the outcome of the Robinson v California?
In a 6-2 decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart, the Court held that laws imprisoning persons afflicted with the “illness” of narcotic addiction inflicted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Which Supreme Court case ruled that the criminalization of addiction is a violation of the 8th Amendment?
In Robinson v. California, the Supreme Court held that a law criminalizing drug addiction violated the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court concluded that criminalizing a disease (like drug addiction) constituted cruel and unusual punishment.
What was the holding in Robinson v California quizlet?
A state statute that imprisons a defendant solely on account of the defendant’s addiction to narcotics is in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
What were the findings of Weems v United States?
UNITED STATES 217 U.S. 349 (1910) In Weems, the Court held that punishment is cruel and unusual if it is grossly excessive for the crime. Paul Weems, a government official in the Philippines, was convicted of falsifying pay records.
What is the triggering of the criminal act by the criminal intent in crimes of criminal conduct known as?
Crimes requiring a criminal act–actus reus–triggered by criminal intent–mens rea.
What Amendment protects homelessness?
The Eighth Amendment
The Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment directly forbids communities from criminalizing certain aspects of homelessness.
Who won US vs Weems?
In a unanimous decision, the Court held that the seizure of items from Weeks’ residence directly violated his constitutional rights. The Court also held that the government’s refusal to return Weeks’ possessions violated the Fourth Amendment.
Which of the Bill of Rights does Weems v United States call into question?
It is within the power of this court to declare a statute of the Penal Code defining a crime and fixing its punishment void as violative of the provision in the Philippine bill of rights prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment.
What are the three main substantive defenses to crimes?
Justification defenses include self-defense, defense of others, defense of property, defense of habitation, consent, and necessity, also called, choice of evils.
Which crimes are complete when the criminal act and criminal intent concur and there is no requirement for resulting harm?
Chapter 3
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Crimes that are complete when the criminal act and criminal intent concur are known as | Conduct Crimes |
| The requirement that the defendant is responsible for the harm in result crimes is known as | Causation |
What was the significance of Robinson v California?
Following is the case brief for Robinson v. California, Supreme Court of the United States, (1962) Case summary for Robinson v. California: Robinson was a drug addict who was convicted under a California state statute which criminalized being addicted to drugs. The trial judge instructed the jury…
What was the significance of Robinson v Margo?
In State v. Margo, the Supreme Court of New Jersey first distinguished Robinson by stating, “In Robinson it was held that a statute of California which made it a criminal offense to ‘be addicted to the use of narcotics’ inflicted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
What did William Joseph Robinson do in California?
Robinson admitted to occasional drug use, and the police found track marks on him. He was convicted of violating a California statute that criminalized people who were addicted to narcotics. William Joseph Brennan, Jr.
What did officer Lindquist testify in Robinson v California?
Officer Lindquist testified that he had examined the appellant the follow morning in the Central Jail in Los Angeles. The officer stated that at that time he had observed discolorations and scabs on the appellant’s arms, and he identified photographs which had been taken of the appellant’s arms shortly after his arrest the night before.