What are examples of intertextuality?
The definition of intertextuality includes forms of parody, pastiche, retellings, homage, and allegory. Any work of literature that is involved in the creation of a new text is considered intertextual.
What is Metatextual?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Metatextuality is a form of intertextual discourse in which one text makes critical commentary on itself or another text. This concept is related to Gérard Genette’s concept of transtextuality in which a text changes or expands on the content of another text.
What is Paratextual material?
In literary interpretation, paratext is material that surrounds a published main text (e.g., the story, non-fiction description, poems, etc.) supplied by the authors, editors, printers, and publishers. Other editorial decisions can also fall into the category of paratext, such as the formatting or typography.
What are the 3 types of intertextuality?
Intertextuality and intertextual relationships can be separated into three types: obligatory, optional and accidental. These variations depend on two key factors: the intention of the writer, and the significance of the reference.
How do I find Intertext?
Intertextuality is when a text implicitly or explicitly refers to another text, by using distinctive, common or recognisable elements of the referenced text. An implicit reference is when the composer alludes to another text through ideas, symbols, genre or style.
What is Situationality?
Situationality. Situationality concerns the factors which make a text relevant to a situation of occurrence. The situation in which a text is exchanged influences the comprehension of the text.
What does Architextuality mean?
Architextuality is the designation of a text as a part of a genre or genres. Hypotextuality or hypertextuality is the relation between a text and a preceding hypotext; wherein the text or genre on which it is based but which it transforms, modifies, elaborates or extends.
What is Metaliterary?
The discussion in any piece of writing of other texts; (Literary Criticism) any literary text which takes the nature of literature as its object; such texts collectively.
What are the 5 types of Transtextuality According to Gérard Genette?
Genette provided five subtypes of transtextuality, namely: intertextuality, paratextuality, architextuality, metatextuality, and hypertextuality (also known as hypotextuality).
What does Peritextual mean?
Filters. (literary theory) Images and textual elements which surround, or are secondary to, the main body of a published work, such as an introduction, notes, front covers, etc. noun.
What are the 7 types of intertextuality?
Intertextual figures include allusion, quotation, calque, plagiarism, translation, pastiche and parody.
Which is the best definition of transtextuality?
Transtextuality is defined as the “textual transcendence of the text”. According to Gérard Genette transtextuality is “all that sets the text in relationship, whether obvious or concealed, with other texts” and it “covers all aspects of a particular text”.Genette described transtextuality as a “more inclusive term” than intertextuality.
What are the elements of transtextuality in Genette?
According to Genette, transtextuality, or textual transcendence, includes elements of imitation, transformation, and the classification of types of discourse. In his own words, transtextuality is “all that sets the text in relationship, whether obvious or concealed with other texts” (Genette 1992: 83-84).
Which is the best example of paratextuality?
Paratextuality is the relation between one text and its paratext that surrounds the main body of the text. Examples are titles, headings, and prefaces. Architextuality is the designation of a text as a part of a genre or genres Metatextuality is the explicit or implicit critical commentary of one text on another text
Which is the best definition of hypertextuality?
In information technology, hypertextuality is a text that takes the reader directly to other texts. ^ Genette, Gérard. The architext: an introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992: 83-84