What is an example of expectancy violation theory?
Examples of Expectancy Violation Theory If the person takes the unexpected behavior as positive, the person will find ways to continue the conversation accordingly, whereas, if it is taken as negative, the person will find it violating and find ways to stop the conversation.
What does Expectancy Violations Theory predict?
Expectancy violations theory predicts and explains the effects of nonverbal behavior violations on interpersonal communication outcomes such as attraction, credibility, persuasion, and smooth interactions.
What is norm violation theory?
In an elaboration of this framework, called norm violation theory, this process is conceptualized as being affected by a number of social-psychological context factors: identification with the own group, intergroup attitudes, perceived differences in power, and feelings of fraternal relative deprivation.
Who developed the Expectancy Violations Theory?
Judee Burgoon
The theory was developed by Judee Burgoon and has been extended by numerous others. The original formulation of EVT focused on perceptions of and reactions to nonverbal communication interaction in initial dyadic encounters (zero-history dyads) but has been extended to both verbal and nonverbal behavior.
What happens when our expectations are violated?
When individuals’ expectations are violated, their interests or attentions are aroused. When arousal occurs, one’s interest or attention to the deviation increases, resulting in less attention paid to the message and more attention to the source of the arousal.
What are the four principles of communication accommodation theory?
They are categorized into four main components: the sociohistorical context, the communicators’ accommodative orientation, the immediate situation and evaluation and future intentions. These components are essential to Communication accommodation Theory and affect the course and outcome of intercultural conversations.
What is the third assumption of Expectancy Violations Theory?
What are the assumptions of expectancy violations theory? In addition, three assumptions guide the theory:Human interaction is driven by expectations. Expectations for human behavior are learned. Evaluations of deviation are mediated by the reward value of the communicator.
Why do we violate norms?
The explanations for norm adherence just cited suggest an answer: sometimes we violate norms in order to maximize our personal payoff, we don’t care about the payoffs of others, and neither the external nor the internal sanctions are sufficient to deter us.
Which communication tradition is most closely associated with expectancy violations theory?
notes 2
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Which communication tradition is most closely associated with Expectancy Violations Theory? | socio-psychological |
| Expectancy violations are always evaluated negatively. | False |
| If we like a person, it is likely that we will positively evaluate most violations of expectancies. | True |
What is meant by violation of expectation?
For the purpose of this communication it is postulated that violation of expectation means a disturbing event or conflict interfering with a previously established mental state that affords a firm belief or confident feeling.
What are the three main aspects of communication accommodation theory?
There are three factors that are crucial to accommodative orientations: (1) “intrapersonal factors” (e.g. personality of the speakers), (2) “intergroup factors” (e.g. communicators’ feelings toward outgroups), and (3) “initial orientations” (e.g., perceived potential for conflict).
What is accommodation theory in SLA?
Accommodation is a theory that breaks down the ongoing, interactive nature of discourse while Acculturation is a model for L2 learning and communication. Although they have different purposes, they do hold an important role in the field of linguistics.
Are there any criticisms of Expectancy Violation Theory?
Criticisms of Expectancy Violation Theory. The theory takes expectations to be negatively influenced. Expectations are vaguely described in the theory. Here, expectations are shown to be more for unknown people more than people related to you, whereas in reality, expectations are more with people you know well.
How are unmet expectations related to expectancy violations?
Unmet expectations are expectancy violations; met expectations are expectancy confirmations. Expected distances are not a precise point but rather a range of distances. If the initiator of a distance passes the invisible threshold that bounds what the target expects for conversational distance, then a violation has occurred.
What happens when people’s expectations are violated?
When individuals’ expectations are violated, their interests or attentions are aroused. When arousal occurs, one’s interest or attention to the deviation increases, resulting in less attention paid to the message and more attention to the source of the arousal. There are two kinds of arousals.
How is EVT related to Nonverbal Expectancy violations?
EVT evolved from a model designed by Burgoon, called the Nonverbal Expectancy Violations Model. This theory brings together two components: proxemics and kinesics. It involves the space between individuals, the ‘proper’ distance to be maintained (within contexts and relationships) and what happens when the boundaries are crossed.